Generalized Hardy-type tests for hierarchy of multipartite non-locality
Yang Fei1, 2, Yuan Yu1, Lin Wen-Lu1, Liao Shu-Ao1, 2, Zhang Cheng-Jie3, Chen Qing1, 2, †
School of Physics and Astronomy, Yunnan University, Kunming 650500, China
Key Laboratory of Quantum Information of Yunnan Province, Kunming 650500, China
College of Physics, Optoelectronics and Energy, Soochow University, Suzhou 215006, China

 

† Corresponding author. E-mail: chenqing@ynu.edu.cn

Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 11575155, 11504253, and 11734015) and the Major Science and Technology Project of Yunnan Province, China (Grant No. 2018ZI002).

Abstract

We propose a family of Hardy-type tests for an arbitrary n-partite system, which can detect different degrees of non-locality ranging from standard to genuine multipartite non-locality. For any non-signaling m-local hidden variable model, the corresponding tests fail, whereas a pass of this type of test indicates that this state is m non-local. We show that any entangled generalized GHZ state exhibits Hardy’s non-locality for each rank of multipartite non-locality. Furthermore, for the detection of m non-localities, a family of Bell-type inequalities based on our test is constructed. Numerical results show that it is more efficient than the inequalities proposed in [Phys. Rev. A 94 022110 (2016)].

1. Introduction

About fifty years ago, Bell demonstrated that there exist quantum correlations based on statistical measurement results which can not be explained by any local hidden variable (LHV) model.[1] After his pioneering work, various experiments have been developed to reveal Bell non-locality[2] including very recently loophole-free Bell experiments.[35] Nowadays, non-locality becomes one of the essential resources for quantum information tasks, such as quantum key distribution,[68] decreasing the communication complexity,[9] and randomness generation.[10] Non-locality can be revealed via different methods, the most famous one is Bell inequalities. Another way is non-locality without inequalities. Unlike Bell’s inequalities which involve many statistical events, non-locality without inequalities can reveal the incompatibility between quantum theory and LHV model via single-run operation. Greenberger et al. firstly proposed this type of methods in 1990,[11] famously known as the GHZ paradox. Hardy’s paradox that was raised in 1993[12] is also an elegant method without inequalities.

Bipartite correlations can be classified as either local or nonlocal. However, when the number of particles is greater than 2, the structure of non-local correlation becomes more complicated. The general classification schemes are k-subsystem non-local that at most k particles of the system exhibit non-local correlation,[13] and m non-local that the system can not be separated into more than m parts (including m). Our paper deals with the latter case, which is the hierarchy of multipartite non-locality (or m separability).[13] The two extreme cases are genuine and standard multipartite non-locality, which correspond to the strongest and the weakest cases, respectively. There are many Bell-type inequalities for different degrees of multipartite non-locality. To detect the standard multipartite non-locality, Mermin–Ardehali–Belinskii–Klyshko (MABK) inequalities[1417] and Werner–Wolf–Zukowski–Brukner (WWZB) inequalities[18,19] were proposed. For the cases of genuine multipartite non-locality, Svetlichny firstly introduced the notion of genuine multipartite non-locality and proposed Bell-type inequalities for genuine tripartite non-locality.[20] Later, Svetlichny inequality was generalized to arbitrary n-partite two-dimensional systems[21] and higher-dimensional systems.[22] Between these two extreme cases, a set of Bell-type inequalities have been derived to detect the hierarchy of multipartite non-locality by Wang et al.[23]

As an elegant method, Hardy’s paradox has been extended to reveal multipartite non-locality. For the standard case, the orginal Hardy’s paradox for two-qubit[12] was extended to n-particle systems by Cereceda,[24] and a generalized Hardy’s paradox was proposed very recently,[25] the experimental verification followed soon after.[26] For the genuine multipartite non-locality case, a Hardy-type test was constructed by Chen et al.[27] based on the marginal probability distribution, and the experimental application has been accomplished in Ref. [28]. Another Hardy-type test for the genuine case was proposed independently in Ref. [29]. While the Hardy-type test for hierarchy of multipartite non-locality has not been given. It is interesting to note that the Hardy’s theorem is a sufficient condition for the violation of Bell inequalities,[30] which allows us to find Bell inequality though Hardy-type tests. So far, the advantages of Hardy’s paradox in some quantum information processing tasks have revealed, which attract many interests recently, such as device-independent dimension witness,[31] temporal non-locality,[32] and device-independent randomness generation.[33]

In this paper, we propose a family of generalized Hardy-type tests for the hierarchy of multipartite non-locality without inequalities for the first time. For standard and genuine multipartite non-locality cases, they reduce to the test in Refs. [24] and [27], respectively. Between these two extreme cases, we obtain several sets of Hardy-type conditions for each rank of multipartite non-locality, and each set of conditions is incompatible with this rank of m-LHV model. We show that any entangled generalized GHZ state exhibits Hardy’s non-locality for each rank of multipartite non-locality. Specifically, for a special choice of measurement basis, a concise formula of the corresponding maximal success probability is derived for the GHZ state (the maximally entangled one) of Hardy-type tests when m ≥ 3. We also derive a family of Bell-type inequalities for hierarchy of multipartite non-locality based on our Hardy-type tests, which includes the inequalities derived in Ref. [23]. More interestingly, our numerical results for the new derived inequalities give lower bound of visibility threshold for the generalized Werner state compare to the inequalities proposed in Ref. [23].

2. Definition of m non-locality

Let us consider a system composed of n space-like separated particles labeled with the index set I = (1,2,…,n). Denote the measurement setting and outcome of the k-th particle (kI) as Mk and rk, respectively. In a standard LHV model, the joint probability distribution P(rI|MI) with measurement settings MI = (M1,…,Mn) and outcomes rI = (r1,…,rn) assumes

where Pk(rk|Mk,λ) is the probability of observer k (kI) measuring observable Mk with outcome rk for a given local hidden variable λ distributed according to ρ(λ) that satisfies ∫ρ(λ)dλ = 1. In such a case, there is no correlations between the observers in such measurement setting. However, if there involve three or more observers, some of the observables from different observers may correlated to each other even though the observers are space-like separated. Among the hybrid local-nonlocal models, the most general one is
where is also nonempty. The correlations shared among the observers in set γ (or ) might be nonlocal. If the joint probability distribution for a given system cannot be decomposed in a way given in Eqs. (1) and (2), then we can say such system exhibits standard and genuine multipartite non-locality, respectively. Between these two extreme cases, there are hierarchal kinds of multipartite non-locality, which are called m-partite (2 ≤ mn) non-locality. The sufficient condition for such non-locality behavior is that the joint probability distribution P(rI|MI) will not admit any non-signaling m-local hidden variable (m-LHV) model, which reads
where sum over {γ} means all possibilities by splitting I into m subsets are covered, that γi ≠ ø, , γiγj = ø for all i,j = 1,2,…,m and ij. Just as Eq. (2), nonlocal correlations may be shared among the observers in γi when |γi|≥ 2, which may exclude the standard LHV model and admit a hybrid local-nonlocal model.

It is also important to mention that the superluminal interaction is forbidden, which means the probability distribution Pγi(rγi|Mγi, λ) has to be non-signaling (|γi|≥ 2)

i.e., for any kγi, the marginal probability distribution of subsystem is independent of the inputs on the k-th part.

3. Hardy-type test of the hierarchy of multipartite non-locality

To detect m non-locality (2 ≤ mn), we construct the following joint probabilities conditions of a qubit system:

where k′ ∈ I is fixed, and we denote , kα = {k′ ∪ α}, bα = bkα for simplicity. The two distinct outcomes of the qubit system are denoted as {0,1}. The above proposal is called Hardy-type test 1, and q > 0 is the success probability.

While, the quantum state will pass the above tests. Let us find the measurement basis for the generalized GHZ state that satisfies Hardy-type test 1. The generalized n-qubit GHZ state is defined as

where 0 ≤ θπ/2, and the standard GHZ state corresponds to θ=π/4.

Quantum mechanically, the measurement settings ak and bk are related to non-commute obsevables {Ak, Bk}, while ak and bk with outcome “0” correspond to the eigenvectors {|ak〉,|bk〉}, and those with outcome “1” correspond to the eigenvectors , that satisfy and . Then, Hardy-type test 1 becomes

Denote . If the above conditions are fulfilled for any measurement basis, then the state ρ will exclude any m-LHV model, and exhibits m non-locality.

We choose a special measurement basis that

Then we find a concise formula of maximal success probabilities for the GHZ state (the maximally entangled one) when m ≥ 3,
And any generalized entangled GHZ state exhibits all rank of multipartite non-locality. The details are given in Appendix A.

Since the m-LHV model in Eq. (3) is defined for all possible {γ}. By splitting {I\k′} into two parts} β and I \ {kβ}, while 0 ≤ |β| ≤ nm and αI \ {kβ}, we get a generalized Hardy-type test 2

The state given in Eq. (8) also satisfies Hardy-type test 2 under the same measurement basis in Eq. (A1) for some cases. One can see the informal discussions in Appendix B.

For the sake of convenience, denote Hardy-type test 2 as [n, m;|β|] scenario. It is obvious that [n, m;0] scenario corresponds to Hardy-type test 1, and [n, n; 0] scenario backs to the original standard Hardy’s paradox.[24] For genuine multipartite cases, [n, 2; |β|] scenario reduces to the test proposed in Ref.[27]. Between these two extreme cases, [n,m;|β|] scenario gives different set of conditions to detect m non-locality of different |β|. Note that the total number of conditions decreases as |β| increases, and for the two extreme cases |β| = 0 and |β| = nm, our scenario contains and 2n + 2 − m conditions, respectively.

In Ref. [27], it has been proven that all genuine multipartite entangled symmetric pure states can be detected by the Hardy-type test which corresponds to [n, 2; |β|] scenario, and through numerical results one can conjecture that all genuine multipartite entangled pure states can be detected by this test. As a matter of fact, our Hardy-type tests for hierarchy of multipartite non-locality exclude all m-LHV model description in principle. Here comes an interesting question, could all (m − 1)-separable entangled states be detected by our Hardy-type tests? However the answer is negative and an illustrating example for a 4-qubit system is given in the following.

Any non-signaling 3-LHV model can not pass these two scenarios, and a 2-separable entangled state may pass them. So the question is that whether all 2-separable entangled states can be detected by these two scenarios or not. Now we introduce the following state:

where , |χ〉 is an arbitrary entangled state. For both scenarios, we obtain the same conditions , , , . Since the maximally entangled two-qubit state can not pass the original Hardy’s paradox,[12] the above four conditions can not fulfill simultaneously. As a result, the state |ψ〉 can not be detected by these two scenarios.

4. Hierarchy of Bell-type inequalities

From the [n, m; |β|] scenario, the corresponding Bell-type inequality can be obtained as

Any n-partite state that violates Eq. (18) exhibits m non-locality.

One can find that equation (18) reduces to inequality (7) of Ref. [23] when |β| = 0. For the case of |β| > 0, we obtain a new type of inequalities for the m-nonlocal cases. For example, for [4, 3; 1] scenario, we get a new Bell inequality

Consider an n-qubit GHZ state in the presence of white noise, which is the generalized Werner state

For any given n, combining Eqs. (18) and (20), we can numerically find out the minimal value of visibility threshold pm;|β| that for p > pm;|β|, state ρw violates the corresponding [n,m;|β|]-th Bell-type inequality. The lower the pm;|β| is, the more noise the corresponding Bell-type inequality can resist. For simplicity, we choose all the measurement settings in the XZ plane of the Bloch sphere, and set and for all 2 ≤ kn. The numerical results are listed in Table 1 for 4 ≤ n ≤ 6. It recovers the results of Wang et al.[23] for |β| = 0. Interestingly, p3;|β|>0 are always lower than p3;0 for any 4 ≤ n ≤ 6, which means that Bell-type inequalities corresponding to [n,3;|β| > 0] are always more efficient than [n,3;|β| = 0] to detect m non-locality. For m > 3, we also find p4;1 = p4;2 < p4;0 in the case of n = 6.

Table 1

Numerical results of pm;|β| of all [n,m] cases of different |β|, where 4 ≤ n ≤ 6. The underlined number is the lowest value of pm;|β| for every [n,m] case.

.
5 Discussion and conclusion

In conclusion, we have generalized Hardy-type tests to detect hierarchy of multipartite non-locality, both of our proposals can can identify different degrees of multipartite non-localities ranging from standard to genuine cases. We show that any generalized entangled GHZ state exhibits Hardy’s non-locality for each rank of multipartite non-locality. Especially, a brief formula of for the GHZ state is derived, which decreases exponentially with n, and increases with m.

Furthermore, a family of the Bell-type inequalities to detect m non-locality is derived in Eq. (18), which includes the Bell-type inequality proposed by Wang et al.[23] (corresponding to the case of |β| = 0). The numerical results in Table 1 reveal that for some given n and m the lower bound of visibility threshold of the generalized Werner state may be obtained in the case of |β| > 0, i.e., the corresponding [n,m;|β| > 0]-th Bell-type inequality is more efficient than the [n,m;|β| = 0]-th one. In particular, the Bell-type inequalities correspond to [n,3;|β| > 0] can resist more noise than [n,3;|β| = 0] for 4 ≤ n ≤ 6.

Reference
[1] Bell J S 1964 Physics 1 195
[2] Clauser J F Horne M A Shimony A Holt R A 1969 Phys. Rev. Lett. 23 880
[3] Hensen B Bernien H DrÉAu A E Reiserer A Kalb N Blok M S Ruitenberg J Vermeulen R F L Schouten R N 2015 Nature 526 682
[4] Giustina M Versteegh M A M Wengerowsky S Handsteiner J Hochrainer A Kevin P 2015 Phys. Rev. Lett. 115 250401
[5] Shalm L K Meyer-Scott E Christensen B G Bierhorst P 2015 Phys. Rev. Lett. 115 250402
[6] Ekert A K 1991 Phys. Rev. Lett. 67 661
[7] Barrett J Hardy L Kent A 2005 Phys. Rev. Lett. 95 010503
[8] Acín A Brunner N Gisin N Massar S Pironio S Scarani V 2007 Phys. Rev. Lett. 98 230501
[9] Buhrman H Cleve R Massar S de Wolf R 2010 Rev. Mod. Phys. 82 665
[10] Pironio S Acín A Massar S Boyer de la Giroday A 2010 Nature 464 1021
[11] Greenberger D M Horne M A Shimony A Zeilinger A 1990 Am. J. Phys. 58 1131
[12] Hardy L 1993 Phys. Rev. Lett. 71 1665
[13] Horodecki R Horodecki P Horodecki M Horodecki K 2009 Rev. Mod. Phys. 81 865
[14] Mermin N D 1990 Phys. Rev. Lett. 65 1838
[15] Mermin N D 1990 Phys. Rev. Lett. 65 3373
[16] Ardehali M 1992 Phys. Rev. A 46 5375
[17] Belinskii A V Klyshko D N 1993 Phys. Usp. 36 653
[18] Werner R F Wolf M M 2001 Phys. Rev. A 64 032112
[19] Żukowski M Brukner Č Laskowski W Wieśniak M 2002 Phys. Rev. Lett. 88 210402
[20] Svetlichny G 1987 Phys. Rev. D 35 3066
[21] Seevinck M Svetlichny G 2002 Phys. Rev. Lett. 89 060401
[22] Chen J L Deng D L Su H Y Wu C Oh C H 2011 Phys. Rev. A 83 022316
[23] Wang X Zhang C Chen A Yu S Yuan H Oh C H 2016 Phys. Rev. A 94 022110
[24] Cereceda J L 2004 Phys. Lett. A 327 433
[25] Jiang S Y Xu Z P Su H Y Pati A K Chen J L 2018 Phys. Rev. Lett. 120 050403
[26] Luo Y H Su H Y Huang H L Wang X L Yang T 2018 Science Bulletin 63 1611
[27] Chen Q Yu S Zhang C Lai C H Oh C H 2014 Phys. Rev. Lett. 112 140404
[28] Zhang C Huang Y F Zhang C J Wang J Liu B H Li C F Guo G C 2016 Opt. Express 24 27059
[29] Rahaman R Wieśniak M Żukowski M 2014 Phys. Rev.A 90 062338
[30] Xiang Y 2011 Chin. Phys. B 20 060301
[31] Mukherjee A Roy A Bhattacharya S S Das S Gazi M R Banik M 2015 Phys. Rev. A 92 022302
[32] Fedrizzi A Almeida M P Broome M A White A G Barbieri M 2011 Phys. Rev. Lett. 106 200402
[33] Li H W Pawlowski M Rahaman R Guo G C Han Z F 2015 Phys. Rev. A 92 022327